AiverseWorld logo

AiverseWorld

Compare

Compare AI tools with a clear side-by-side workflow

Start with two products, then move into pricing, capability, platform fit, and practical tradeoffs.

Selected comparison

Veracode AI vs Checkmarx AI

This comparison was retrieved by database IDs selected from the catalog.

Veracode AI favicon

Veracode AI

Veracode

Checkmarx AI favicon

Checkmarx AI

Checkmarx

Overview
Rating
—
—
Category
Developer Tools
Developer Tools
Subcategory
AI Application Security and Risk Management Platform
AI Application Security Testing Platform
Company
Veracode
Checkmarx
Status
Active
Active
Launch year
2023
2023
Tags
appsecaisastbinary-analysisscadevsecops
appsecaisastscadastdevsecops
Pricing
Starting price
FreeBest value
Free
Pricing model
Enterprise
Enterprise
Free plan
No
No
Free trial
✓
✓
Pricing notes

Enterprise licensing. No public pricing. Annual contracts. Privately held (Broadcom subsidiary). Demo available.

Enterprise licensing. No public pricing. Annual contracts. Private company (Hellman & Friedman). Demo available.

Capabilities
Best for
AI-automated code fix for security vulnerabilitiesBinary scanning for third-party and legacy applicationsEnterprise application security with policy enforcementSoftware supply chain security programmeUnified application security risk management
AI-assisted application security remediationDevSecOps SAST, SCA, and DAST in one platformOpen-source dependency vulnerability managementIaC security scanning for cloud infrastructureAPI security testing
Target audience
CISOs and AppSec programme leadersEnterprise security architectsSoftware development teams with compliance requirementsProcurement teams evaluating third-party software securityDevSecOps programme owners
Security engineers and AppSec teamsDevSecOps advocates and platform engineersCISO offices and security architectsSoftware engineering teams with security requirementsCompliance and risk teams
AI type
LLM Assistant
LLM Assistant
Modalities
CodeText
CodeText
Technical
Model provider
OpenAIVeracode
OpenAICheckmarx
Model names
—
—
API available
✕
✕
Open source
✕
✕
Deployment
SaaS
SaaSOn-premise
Platforms
WebIDE pluginsCI/CDAPI
WebIDE pluginsCI/CDAPI
Integrations
GitHubGitLabJenkinsJiraAzure DevOpsAPI
GitHubGitLabJenkinsAzure DevOpsJiraAPI
Team collaboration
✕
✓
Trust & security
Security

SOC 2 Type II. ISO 27001. GDPR compliant. FedRAMP authorised. Enterprise data handling agreements.

SOC 2 Type II. ISO 27001. GDPR compliant. FedRAMP eligible. Enterprise data handling agreements.

Privacy notes

Source code and binary application data transmitted to Veracode cloud for analysis. FedRAMP for US government application security scanning.

Source code and vulnerability scan data processed on Checkmarx cloud or customer on-premise. Code scanning occurs locally in CI/CD pipelines — code transmitted to cloud for reporting and management.

Verdict
Pros
  • Adobe, IBM, and Expedia validate Veracode for enterprise application security at major software scale
  • Veracode Fix AI-generated code patches reduce time from vulnerability identification to remediation
  • Binary analysis uniquely enables scanning third-party and legacy applications without source code access
  • FedRAMP authorisation enables US government application security scanning
  • Airbnb, Samsung, and Salesforce validate across internet-scale consumer and enterprise software
  • AI Guided Remediation reduces developer friction — explaining what to fix and providing code suggestions rather than opaque vulnerability reports
  • Full AST spectrum (SAST, SCA, DAST, IaC) in one platform reduces DevSecOps tool fragmentation
  • 30+ language SAST coverage addresses polyglot development environments
Cons
  • Broadcom subsidiary — evaluate product investment continuity under semiconductor company ownership
  • Transmitting code to cloud for scanning may concern organisations with strict IP protection requirements
  • Competing with Checkmarx (rank 812), Snyk (covered), and GitHub Advanced Security for AST market
  • Private equity ownership under Hellman & Friedman — evaluate product investment continuity
  • False positive rates in SAST require tuning — evaluate false positive rates during proof of concept
  • Competing with Snyk (covered), Veracode (rank 813), and Semgrep for application security market

Trending comparisons

120 curated matchups

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement