AiverseWorld logo

AiverseWorld

Scite AI favicon
Verified July 1, 2025AI Citation Intelligence

Scite AI

Scite / scite.ai

AI-powered research platform that shows how scientific papers have been cited and whether findings were supported or contradicted.

Visit Scite AI

Pricing

$12/mo

Free plan

No

Category

Research

Platforms

2

Rating

4.7 (480)

Free plan

No

API access

Yes

Open source

No

Platforms

2

Advertisement

What is Scite AI?

Scite is an AI research intelligence platform used by 500,000+ researchers at 5,000+ institutions for understanding how scientific papers are cited in context. Scite's Citation Statements show whether a paper's findings were supported, mentioned, or contradicted by subsequent research. Scite Assistant uses AI to answer research questions with evidence drawn directly from citing papers. Used to verify research credibility and find contradictions.

citationsresearch integrityAI researchpeer-reviewsystematic reviewresearch credibilityacademic AI
Explore more Research tools →

How Scite AI works

Scite AI runs as nlp and ml software built around text and data workflows. Users typically start with a prompt, upload, or connected data source, and the underlying model handles the heavy lifting before returning a result you can refine or export. It's available on web and chrome extension, with API access for teams that want to embed it into their own products.

Key Features

What makes it worth shortlisting

The capabilities that matter most for teams evaluating Scite AI.

01

Citation Statements (supported/contradicted/mentioned)

Practical for researchers, academics, and institutions wanting to understand the citation context of research papers and identify supported vs contradicted findings. without extra setup.

02

Scite Assistant AI research Q&A

Practical for researchers, academics, and institutions wanting to understand the citation context of research papers and identify supported vs contradicted findings. without extra setup.

03

Smart Citations dashboard

Practical for researchers, academics, and institutions wanting to understand the citation context of research papers and identify supported vs contradicted findings. without extra setup.

04

5,000+ institution and 500,000+ researcher users

Practical for researchers, academics, and institutions wanting to understand the citation context of research papers and identify supported vs contradicted findings. without extra setup.

05

Research credibility assessment

Practical for researchers, academics, and institutions wanting to understand the citation context of research papers and identify supported vs contradicted findings. without extra setup.

06

Dashboard for monitoring citations

Practical for researchers, academics, and institutions wanting to understand the citation context of research papers and identify supported vs contradicted findings. without extra setup.

Grant application research supportResearch report generationJournal and author trust scoringIntegration with Zotero and Mendeley

Best use cases

Researchers, academics, and institutions wanting to understand the citation context of research papers and identify supported vs contradicted findings.

Who should use it

Academic researchers
Faculty and graduate students
Research institutions
Medical professionals
Systematic reviewers

Pros

  • Citation context analysis is unique and valuable
  • Scite Assistant AI Q&A with evidence
  • 5,000+ institution validation
  • Research credibility assessment novel
  • Zotero and Mendeley integration

Cons

  • No free tier (7-day trial only)
  • Less comprehensive database than Elicit or Consensus
  • Less useful for non-academic users
  • Premium pricing for institutions

Advertisement

Pricing Analysis

Is it worth the price?

Starter from $12/month; Team from $39/user/month; Enterprise custom; 7-day trial

Model

Subscription

Starting price

$12/mo

Free trial

Yes

Similar Tools

Tools like Scite AI

Elicit (systematic reviews)|Consensus (evidence synthesis)|Connected Papers (citation networks)|Semantic Scholar (academic search, free)|Web of Science (institutional access)

Comparison

Scite AI vs Elicit

A side-by-side look at the closest alternative in this category.

Scite AI favicon

Scite AI

Scite

Elicit favicon

Elicit

Elicit

Overview
Rating
4.7480 reviewsTop rated
4.54,000 reviews
Category
Research
Research
Subcategory
AI Citation Intelligence
AI Research Assistant
Company
Scite
Elicit
Status
Active
Active
Launch year
2019
2021
Tags
citationsresearch integrityAI researchpeer-reviewsystematic reviewresearch credibilityacademic AI
researchacademicliterature-reviewpapersai-research
Pricing
Starting price
$12/moBest value
$12/mo
Pricing model
Subscription
Freemium
Free plan
No
Yes
Free trial
✓
✕
Pricing notes

Starter from $12/month; Team from $39/user/month; Enterprise custom; 7-day trial

Free plan with 5,000 papers and limited monthly queries. Plus $12/month with more queries and advanced features. Enterprise custom pricing.

Capabilities
Best for

Researchers, academics, and institutions wanting to understand the citation context of research papers and identify supported vs contradicted findings.

Systematic literature reviewsResearch scopingEvidence synthesisAcademic paper discoveryMeta-analysis support
Target audience
Academic researchersFaculty and graduate studentsResearch institutionsMedical professionalsSystematic reviewers
Academic researchersGraduate studentsScientistsPolicy analystsEvidence-based practitioners
AI type
NLPMLGenerative AIInformation Extraction
Document Analysis LLM
Modalities
TextData
TextDocument
Technical
Model provider
Proprietary + OpenAI
—
Model names
Scite AIGPT-4
—
API available
✓
✕
Open source
✕
✕
Deployment
Cloud
SaaS
Platforms
WebChrome extension
Web
Integrations
ZoteroMendeleyPubMedWeb of ScienceScopus
ZoteroCSV exportAPI
Team collaboration
✓
✕
Trust & security
Security
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRCCPA

Review Elicit's data handling policy. Uploaded PDFs may be processed by third-party AI providers. No personal health data storage.

Privacy notes

SOC 2 Type II; GDPR DPA; institutional data isolation

Review privacy policy before uploading sensitive research documents. Enterprise plans include data handling agreements.

Verdict
Pros
  • Citation context analysis is unique and valuable
  • Scite Assistant AI Q&A with evidence
  • 5,000+ institution validation
  • Research credibility assessment novel
  • Zotero and Mendeley integration
  • Dramatically reduces time for initial literature review and paper screening
  • Comparative paper tables make cross-study synthesis efficient
  • Strong for scoping reviews and initial evidence mapping
  • Reasonable pricing for the time savings it provides
Cons
  • No free tier (7-day trial only)
  • Less comprehensive database than Elicit or Consensus
  • Less useful for non-academic users
  • Premium pricing for institutions
  • AI extractions are not always accurate for specific quantitative data
  • Not a substitute for careful reading of important papers
  • Search database is large but not exhaustive of all literature
Details

Technical & deployment info

Key facts about model providers, platforms, and team support.

Model Provider

Proprietary + OpenAI

Models

Scite AI, GPT-4

Platforms

Web, Chrome extension

Deployment

Cloud

Integrations

Zotero, Mendeley, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus

Team Collaboration

Yes

Launch Year

2019

Trust

Security & privacy

Compliance signals and data-handling notes as reported by the vendor.

SOC 2 Type IIGDPRCCPA

SOC 2 Type II; GDPR DPA; institutional data isolation

Reviews

What users are saying

Verified reviews from signed-in users, stored in the backend and averaged into this tool's rating.

0.00 reviews
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Sign in to rate Scite AI and leave a review.

No other reviews yet — be the first to share how this tool performs in practice.

FAQ

Common questions about Scite AI

Scite's analysis of how a paper is cited in context, showing whether citing papers support, contradict, or merely mention the original finding.

Editorial Verdict

Should you use Scite AI?

Scite is the most sophisticated tool for verifying research credibility — its Citation Statements showing whether findings were supported or contradicted are genuinely novel and valuable for systematic reviewers.

Last verified July 1, 2025.

Advertisement