Anysphere / cursor.com
AI-native code editor built on a VS Code fork with codebase-wide context, multi-file editing, and autonomous coding agents.
Free plan
Yes
API access
No
Open source
No
Platforms
3
Cursor is the most discussed AI-native code editor of 2024 and 2025. Built by Anysphere, founded by ex-OpenAI researchers, it takes a fundamentally different approach than GitHub Copilot: rather than adding AI as an extension to an existing editor, Cursor rebuilt VS Code from the ground up with AI as a core part of the architecture.
The most significant practical difference is codebase context. Where GitHub Copilot understands the current file and nearby files, Cursor's Composer feature understands the entire project structure and makes changes across multiple files simultaneously from a single natural language instruction. This makes it far more capable for refactoring, feature implementation, and large-scale code changes than autocomplete-style assistants. Developers routinely report saving multiple hours per week on complex tasks.
Cursor uses multiple AI models including Claude Sonnet, GPT-4o, and others, letting users choose which model to apply per task. The Tab autocomplete predicts multi-line edits rather than single-line suggestions, which feels qualitatively different from older autocomplete tools.
Pricing changed significantly in mid-2025, moving from a request-based system to a credit-based model. Each paid plan comes with a credit pool equal to the plan price in dollars, and using expensive models or longer contexts depletes credits faster. This generated community frustration because it made actual costs harder to predict. Users relying heavily on Claude Opus can incur overages beyond the base plan.
Cursor runs as code llm software built around text and code workflows. Users typically start with a prompt, upload, or connected data source, and the underlying model handles the heavy lifting before returning a result you can refine or export. It's available on windows, mac, and linux.
The capabilities that matter most for teams evaluating Cursor.
Natural language instructions that edit multiple files simultaneously across the codebase.
Predicts multi-line code changes based on project-wide context.
Run coding tasks asynchronously while continuing to work on other parts of the project.
Free Hobby plan with limited AI use. Pro $20/month with usage-based credit pool. Business $40/user/month with admin controls and enforced privacy mode.
Model
Freemium
Starting price
$20/mo
Free trial
No
GitHub Copilot has broader editor support and works in JetBrains IDEs. Windsurf offers similar features at a lower price point. Aider is a free open-source alternative for terminal-based agentic coding.
A side-by-side look at the closest alternative in this category.
Key facts about model providers, platforms, and team support.
Model Provider
Anthropic, OpenAI, Google
Models
Claude Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini
Platforms
Windows, Mac, Linux
Deployment
Desktop
Integrations
GitHub, VS Code extensions, Git
Team Collaboration
Yes
Launch Year
2023
Compliance signals and data-handling notes as reported by the vendor.
Business plan enforces privacy mode. Code never sent to train models. SAML SSO and admin dashboard included.
Free and Pro plans: code may be stored for product improvement unless privacy mode is enabled. Business enforces privacy mode by default. Review settings before use with proprietary code.
Editorial Verdict
Cursor is the best AI code editor for developers who primarily use VS Code and want deep codebase context with multi-file agentic editing. JetBrains users and those wanting a plugin approach should evaluate GitHub Copilot or Windsurf instead.
Last verified July 24, 2026.
Cursor crossed one million users and over a billion dollars in annualised revenue within 18 months, reflecting strong product-market fit. Companies including Stripe and Figma have adopted it as their default editor.
The main limitation compared to GitHub Copilot is editor coverage. Cursor only works in its own VS Code fork. Developers who use JetBrains IDEs, Neovim, or Xcode cannot use it. For teams where developers use different editors, Cursor is harder to standardise.
Free Hobby plan with limited AI use. Pro $20/month with usage-based credit pool. Business $40/user/month with admin controls and enforced privacy mode.
Free plan with limited flows and completions. Pro $15/month with more flows and extended context. Teams $35/user/month with admin features. Enterprise custom pricing.
Business plan enforces privacy mode. Code never sent to train models. SAML SSO and admin dashboard included.
Teams plan includes privacy mode ensuring code is not used for training. Admin controls and centralised billing.
Free and Pro plans: code may be stored for product improvement unless privacy mode is enabled. Business enforces privacy mode by default. Review settings before use with proprietary code.
Free and Pro plans: code may be processed by Codeium's servers. Teams plan privacy mode prevents code from being used for training. Review settings before using with proprietary code.
Verified reviews from signed-in users, stored in the backend and averaged into this tool's rating.
Sign in to rate Cursor and leave a review.
No other reviews yet — be the first to share how this tool performs in practice.